🔗 Share this article

Turns out the manager was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. Survive a decisive European final against a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, laying waste to the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his nine months of experience with the Saints, to view him as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Conflict Over Formation and Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Supreme Power In the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

A Modern Football Hierarchy: Executives Above Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

Nowadays, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss them for using too much 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then bin him for requiring too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.