🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an celebration that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are remunerated to address white audiences about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the Britain, Deutschland, Éire and the Holland.

The period has evolved since those days, focusing less on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it progresses is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how critical it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the European continent as a entirety.

In the United States, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to scrub the history of people of color and experience from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. An academic expert, a prof at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not avoid governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves simple recognition of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Establishments who mark it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and alertness to “microaggressions”, but faced with the risks that impact society if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Black History is Now Month.